Treatment interventions to maintain abstinence from alcohol in primary care: systematic review and network meta-analysis

Hung-yuan Cheng, Luke A Mcguinness, Roy G Elbers, Georgina J Macarthur, Abigail Taylor, Alexandra Mcaleenan, Sarah Dawson, José A López-lópez, Julian P T Higgins, Sean Cowlishaw, Anne Lingford-hughes, Matthew Hickman, David Kessler*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

11 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objective
To determine the most effective interventions in recently detoxified, alcohol dependent patients for implementation in primary care.

Design
Systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Data sources
Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization’s International Clinical Trials Registry Platform.

Study selection
Randomised controlled trials comparing two or more interventions that could be used in primary care. The population was patients with alcohol dependency diagnosed by standardised clinical tools and who became detoxified within four weeks.

Data extraction
Outcomes of interest were continuous abstinence from alcohol (effectiveness) and all cause dropouts (as a proxy for acceptability) at least 12 weeks after start of intervention.

Results
64 trials (43 interventions) were included. The median probability of abstinence across placebo arms was 25%. Compared with placebo, the only intervention associated with increased probability of abstinence and moderate certainty evidence was acamprosate (odds ratio 1.86, 95% confidence interval 1.49 to 2.33, corresponding to an absolute probability of 38%). Of the 62 included trials that reported all cause dropouts, interventions associated with a reduced number of dropouts compared with placebo (probability 50%) and moderate certainty of evidence were acamprosate (0.73, 0.62 to 0.86; 42%), naltrexone (0.70, 0.50 to 0.98; 41%), and acamprosate-naltrexone (0.30, 0.13 to 0.67; 17%). Acamprosate was the only intervention associated with moderate confidence in the evidence of effectiveness and acceptability up to 12 months. It is uncertain whether other interventions can help maintain abstinence and reduce dropouts because of low confidence in the evidence.

Conclusions
Evidence is lacking for benefit from interventions that could be implemented in primary care settings for alcohol abstinence, other than for acamprosate. More evidence from high quality randomised controlled trials is needed, as are strategies using combined interventions (combinations of drug interventions or drug and psychosocial interventions) to improve treatment of alcohol dependency in primary care.
Original languageEnglish
Article numberm3934
Number of pages13
JournalBMJ
Volume371
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 25 Nov 2020

Cite this