Treatment temperature and insult severity influence the neuroprotective effects of therapeutic hypothermia

Thomas Wood, Damjan Osredkar, Maja Puchades, Elke Maes, Mari Falck, Torun Flatebø, Lars Walløe, Hemmen Sabir, Marianne Thoresen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

80 Citations (Scopus)
297 Downloads (Pure)


Therapeutic hypothermia (HT) is standard care for moderate and severe neonatal hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy (HIE), the leading cause of permanent brain injury in term newborns. However, the optimal temperature for HT is still unknown, and few preclinical studies have compared multiple HT treatment temperatures. Additionally, HT may not benefit infants with severe encephalopathy. In a neonatal rat model of unilateral hypoxia-ischaemia (HI), the effect of five different HT temperatures was investigated after either moderate or severe injury. At postnatal-day seven, rat pups underwent moderate or severe HI followed by 5 h at normothermia (37 °C), or one of five HT temperatures: 33.5 °C, 32 °C, 30 °C, 26 °C, and 18 °C. One week after treatment, neuropathological analysis of hemispheric and hippocampal area loss, and CA1 hippocampal pyramidal neuron count, was performed. After moderate injury, a significant reduction in hemispheric and hippocampal loss on the injured side, and preservation of CA1 pyramidal neurons, was seen in the 33.5 °C, 32 °C, and 30 °C groups. Cooling below 33.5 °C did not provide additional neuroprotection. Regardless of treatment temperature, HT was not neuroprotective in the severe HI model. Based on these findings, and previous experience translating preclinical studies into clinical application, we propose that milder cooling should be considered for future clinical trials.

Original languageEnglish
Article number23430
Number of pages12
JournalScientific Reports
Publication statusPublished - 21 Mar 2016


  • Neonatal brain damage
  • Neurophysiology
  • Stroke


Dive into the research topics of 'Treatment temperature and insult severity influence the neuroprotective effects of therapeutic hypothermia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this