Truth Clashes: caste atrocities, false cases and the limits of hate crime law in North India

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

enThis link goes to a English sectionfrThis link goes to a French section
This article brings together theories of truth in legal anthropology and the anthropology of religion to highlight how legal institutions can co-opt hate crime laws and reproduce patterns of sociopolitical oppression. Drawing on extensive ethnographic research on the social life of India's only hate crime law – the 1989 Prevention of Atrocities Act (PoA), which punishes violence against Dalit (ex-untouchable) communities – the article argues that hate crime cases involve a clash between three different truth logics: attributive truth or credibility; formal juridical truth regimes defined by evidentiary technicalities; and a distinct mode of experiential-discriminatory truth, which is defined by its processual character. As Indian police and judiciary conflate these truth logics in practice, they publicly and legally erase realities of caste discrimination and (re)construct marginalized communities like Dalits as greedy and unreliable narrators.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)669-686
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of the Royal Anthropological Institute
Volume30
Issue number3
Early online date26 Jan 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Royal Anthropological Institute.

Research Groups and Themes

  • SPS Centre for the Study of Poverty and Social Justice

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Truth Clashes: caste atrocities, false cases and the limits of hate crime law in North India'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this