Abstract
Over the last two decades, Gramscian research in China has shifted away from seeing Gramsci as a Western Marxist, from studying the philosophy of praxis to grappling with the concept of hegemony, and from only interpreting Gramsci’s thought to examining social problems in China through Gramscian lenses. However, Gramscian scholarship in China is found problematic too, namely, the misappropriation of the concept of hegemony, the lack of consideration of Gramsci’s other concepts, especially the integral State, and still relatively a dearth of studies on Chinese intellectuals using Gramsci’s concept of (organic) intellectuals. It is within this acknowledgment that the article suggests eight new frontiers that would advance Gramscian scholarship in China.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 296 |
Number of pages | 319 |
Journal | International Gramsci Journal |
Volume | 4 |
Issue number | 4 |
Publication status | Published - 3 Aug 2022 |
Keywords
- Hegemony
- Communist Party of China
- England
- organic intellectual
- Socialism