Two-sample Mendelian randomisation: avoiding the downsides of a powerful, widely applicable but potentially fallible technique

Fernando Pires Hartwig, Neil Davies, Gibran Hemani, George Davey Smith

Research output: Contribution to journal › Editorial (Academic Journal) › peer-review

287 Citations (Scopus)
531 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

[no abstract]
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1717-1726
Number of pages10
JournalInternational Journal of Epidemiology
Volume45
Issue number6
Early online date28 Mar 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Access to Document

  • Full-text PDF (final published version)

    This is the final published version of the article (version of record). It first appeared online via Oxford University Press at https://academic.oup.com/ije/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/ije/dyx028. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.

    Final published version, 404 KBLicence: CC BY

Handle.net

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Two-sample Mendelian randomisation: avoiding the downsides of a powerful, widely applicable but potentially fallible technique'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
    View full fingerprint

    Cite this