Two Year Resanctioning Study: A Comparison of Restorative and Traditional Cautions

A Wilcox, RP Young, C Hoyle

Research output: Book/ReportCommissioned report

Abstract

This study is based on a comparison of the resanctioning rates of 29,000 offenders who had received a caution in either Thames Valley (which used restorative cautions) or two comparison forces (which used traditional cautions). The study found no evidence to suggest that restorative cautioning had resulted in a statistically significant reduction in either the overall resanctioning rate or the seriousness or frequency of offending.
Translated title of the contributionTwo Year Resanctioning Study: A Comparison of Restorative and Traditional Cautions
Original languageEnglish
PublisherHome Office
Number of pages36
ISBN (Print)184473479X
Publication statusPublished - 2004

Bibliographical note

Publisher: London: RDS, Home Office
Other identifier: Online Report 57/04

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Two Year Resanctioning Study: A Comparison of Restorative and Traditional Cautions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this