Two Year Resanctioning Study: A Comparison of Restorative and Traditional Cautions

A Wilcox; RP Young; C Hoyle

Two Year Resanctioning Study: A Comparison of Restorative and Traditional Cautions

A Wilcox
, RP Young
, C Hoyle

University of Bristol Law School

Research output: Book/Report › Commissioned report

Abstract

This study is based on a comparison of the resanctioning rates of 29,000 offenders who had received a caution in either Thames Valley (which used restorative cautions) or two comparison forces (which used traditional cautions). The study found no evidence to suggest that restorative cautioning had resulted in a statistically significant reduction in either the overall resanctioning rate or the seriousness or frequency of offending.

Translated title of the contribution	Two Year Resanctioning Study: A Comparison of Restorative and Traditional Cautions
Original language	English
Publisher	Home Office
Number of pages	36
ISBN (Print)	184473479X
Publication status	Published - 2004

Bibliographical note

Publisher: London: RDS, Home Office
Other identifier: Online Report 57/04

Access to Document

http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs04/rdsolr5704.pdf

Handle.net

Persistent link

Cite this

@book{1f18f37c8a3a451d8963e0e8f4a904ab,

title = "Two Year Resanctioning Study: A Comparison of Restorative and Traditional Cautions",

abstract = "This study is based on a comparison of the resanctioning rates of 29,000 offenders who had received a caution in either Thames Valley (which used restorative cautions) or two comparison forces (which used traditional cautions). The study found no evidence to suggest that restorative cautioning had resulted in a statistically significant reduction in either the overall resanctioning rate or the seriousness or frequency of offending.",

author = "A Wilcox and RP Young and C Hoyle",

note = "Publisher: London: RDS, Home Office Other identifier: Online Report 57/04",

year = "2004",

language = "English",

isbn = "184473479X",

publisher = "Home Office",

}

TY - BOOK

T1 - Two Year Resanctioning Study: A Comparison of Restorative and Traditional Cautions

AU - Wilcox, A

AU - Young, RP

AU - Hoyle, C

N1 - Publisher: London: RDS, Home Office Other identifier: Online Report 57/04

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - This study is based on a comparison of the resanctioning rates of 29,000 offenders who had received a caution in either Thames Valley (which used restorative cautions) or two comparison forces (which used traditional cautions). The study found no evidence to suggest that restorative cautioning had resulted in a statistically significant reduction in either the overall resanctioning rate or the seriousness or frequency of offending.

AB - This study is based on a comparison of the resanctioning rates of 29,000 offenders who had received a caution in either Thames Valley (which used restorative cautions) or two comparison forces (which used traditional cautions). The study found no evidence to suggest that restorative cautioning had resulted in a statistically significant reduction in either the overall resanctioning rate or the seriousness or frequency of offending.

M3 - Commissioned report

SN - 184473479X

BT - Two Year Resanctioning Study: A Comparison of Restorative and Traditional Cautions

PB - Home Office

ER -

Two Year Resanctioning Study: A Comparison of Restorative and Traditional Cautions

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Access to Document

Handle.net

Fingerprint

Cite this