UK real-world evidence on pembrolizumab and neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage triple-negative breast cancer

J. McKeon*, E Daniels, A. Halstead, C. Machado, S. Potter, T. Strawson-Smith, A. Okines, S. Mcintosh, H. Tovey, T. Robinson, Early-Stage Immunotherapy (ESIT) Study Group, et al

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

Abstract

Background:
The KEYNOTE-522 trial showed that use of pembrolizumab-chemotherapy for stage 2-3 triple-negative breast cancer improved pathological complete response (pCR) rates and event-free and overall survival compared with chemotherapy alone. This retrospective multicentre cohort study collated real-world-evidence (RWE) of the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab-chemotherapy.

Patients and methods:
Patients treated with pembrolizumab-chemotherapy who completed pembrolizumab treatment before 1 July 2024 were included in the study. Data were collected on safety and efficacy of treatment. pCR rates were compared between subgroups using chi-square and tests for trend (where appropriate), no adjustment was made for multiplicity.

Results:
Five hundred and forty-five patients were recruited from 34 UK centres (median age 50 years, range 21-79 years). Neoadjuvant treatment delays and discontinuations were reported by 59% [95% confidence interval (CI) 55% to 63%] and 47% (95% CI 42% to 51%) respectively. Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were experienced by 65% (95% CI 61% to 69%); 20% of patients (95% CI 16% to 23%) experienced grade ≥3 irAEs. A total of 83% (95% CI 80% to 86%) and 45% (95% CI 41% to 50%) of patients had unplanned medical contacts and admissions. pCR rate was 56% (95% CI 52% to 60%). IrAEs were associated with increased pCR rates, but steroid use and pembrolizumab-chemotherapy discontinuation did not adversely affect rates of pCR.

Conclusions:
This large, national RWE study demonstrates pCR rate was lower compared with that observed in KEYNOTE-522. High rates of dose reductions, discontinuations and unplanned medical contacts (with significant health care resource use) suggests that patient selection is important for this regimen. Collection of long-term outcomes will be important to better evaluate the benefit/risks of pembrolizumab, especially in certain subgroups.
Original languageEnglish
Article number100664
Number of pages12
JournalESMO Real World Data and Digital Oncology
Volume11
Early online date8 Jan 2026
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 8 Jan 2026

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
Crown Copyright © 2025 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of European Society for Medical Oncology.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'UK real-world evidence on pembrolizumab and neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage triple-negative breast cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this