Skip to content

‘Under cross-examination she fainted’: sexual crime and swooning in the Victorian courtroom

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)456-470
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Victorian Culture
Volume21
Issue number4
Early online date2 Aug 2016
DOIs
DateAccepted/In press - 2 Jun 2016
DateE-pub ahead of print - 2 Aug 2016
DatePublished (current) - Oct 2016

Abstract

The ‘swooning’ female was a trope of Victorian culture and a regular feature on the witness stand. This article analyses rape narratives and witnesses’ readings of the body to show that female unconsciousness had a variety of social, medical, and legal implications in court. It shows that terms such as ‘faint’, ‘swoon’, ‘syncope’, and ‘insensibility’ had particular narrative functions and different social or legal implications. Despite the importance of female loss of consciousness in Victorian culture, its contemporary meanings have only been loosely studied historiographically – primarily in the context of passing references to Victorian gender stereotypes. Literary scholars have unpicked the trope of the ‘swooning female’ and her narrative function much more thoroughly for the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries when it was particularly prevalent, yet have not examined how these narratives operated in real-world contexts. This article makes a contribution both to historiography and cultural studies, by showing how a deconstruction of courtroom narratives and gendered performance can shed light on the function of specific pieces of evidence in courtroom scripts.

    Research areas

  • fainting, insensibility, swooning, sexual crime, rape, femininity, emotions, crime narratives, courtroom, legal

    Structured keywords

  • Centre for Humanities Health and Science

Download statistics

No data available

Documents

Documents

  • Full-text PDF (final published version)

    Rights statement: This is the final published version of the article (version of record). It first appeared online via Taylor & Francis at http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13555502.2016.1198269. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.

    Final published version, 428 KB, PDF document

DOI

View research connections

Related faculties, schools or groups