Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Understanding opposition to human gene editing: A role for pathogen disgust sensitivity?

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article (Academic Journal) › peer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent advances in gene editing technology promise much for medical advances and human well-being. However, in parallel domains, there have been objections to the use of such biotechnologies. Moreover, the psychological factors that govern the willingness to use gene editing technology have been underexplored to date. In this registered report, we sought to test whether pathogen disgust sensitivity is linked with opposition to gene editing. U.K.-based adult participants (N = 347) were recruited to this study. Gene editing attitudes reflected two largely distinct latent factors concerning enhancing human traits and treating medical disorders. In contrast to prediction, pathogen disgust sensitivity was related to greater support for gene editing in both of these domains. This result suggests that gene editing, at least in the current study, is not viewed as pathogenic, or that the perceived benefits of gene editing outweigh any perceived pathogen risk.
Original languageEnglish
JournalPolitics and the Life Sciences
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Understanding opposition to human gene editing: A role for pathogen disgust sensitivity?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this