Abstract
Background Health systems are seeking to harness digital tools to promote patient autonomy and increase the efficiency of care worldwide. The NHS Long Term Plan created the right for patients to access ‘digital first’ primary care by 2023–2024, including online patient access to full medical records.
Aim To identify and understand the unintended consequences of online patient access to medical records.
Design and setting Qualitative interview study in 10 general practices in South West and North West England.
Method Semi-structured individual interviews with 13 patients and 16 general practice staff with experience of patient online access to health records.
Results Online access generated unintended consequences that negatively impacted patients’ understanding of their health care, with patients finding surprising or difficult to interpret information. Online access impacted GPs’ documentation practices, such as when GPs pre-emptively attempted to minimise potential misunderstandings to aid patient understanding of their health care. In other cases, this negatively impacted the quality of the records and patient safety when GPs avoided documenting speculations or concerns. Contrary to assumptions that workload would be reduced, online access introduced extra work, such as managing and monitoring access, and taking measures to prevent possible harm to patients.
Conclusion The unintended consequences described by both staff and patients show that, to achieve the intended consequences set out in NHS policy, additional work is necessary to prepare records for sharing and to prepare patients about what to expect. It is crucial that practices are adequately supported and resourced to manage the unintended consequences of online access, now that it is the default position. A table of potential unintended consequences and mitigation measures is provided to aid practice managers and clinicians implementing online access.
Aim To identify and understand the unintended consequences of online patient access to medical records.
Design and setting Qualitative interview study in 10 general practices in South West and North West England.
Method Semi-structured individual interviews with 13 patients and 16 general practice staff with experience of patient online access to health records.
Results Online access generated unintended consequences that negatively impacted patients’ understanding of their health care, with patients finding surprising or difficult to interpret information. Online access impacted GPs’ documentation practices, such as when GPs pre-emptively attempted to minimise potential misunderstandings to aid patient understanding of their health care. In other cases, this negatively impacted the quality of the records and patient safety when GPs avoided documenting speculations or concerns. Contrary to assumptions that workload would be reduced, online access introduced extra work, such as managing and monitoring access, and taking measures to prevent possible harm to patients.
Conclusion The unintended consequences described by both staff and patients show that, to achieve the intended consequences set out in NHS policy, additional work is necessary to prepare records for sharing and to prepare patients about what to expect. It is crucial that practices are adequately supported and resourced to manage the unintended consequences of online access, now that it is the default position. A table of potential unintended consequences and mitigation measures is provided to aid practice managers and clinicians implementing online access.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 0720 |
| Pages (from-to) | e67-e74 |
| Journal | British Journal of General Practice |
| Volume | 73 |
| Issue number | 726 |
| Early online date | 1 Nov 2022 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 1 Nov 2022 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© The Authors.