Skip to content

(Un)-Making the Boundaries of Environmental Law Scholarship: Interdisciplinarity Beyond the Social Sciences?

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter in a book

Standard

(Un)-Making the Boundaries of Environmental Law Scholarship : Interdisciplinarity Beyond the Social Sciences? / Pieraccini, Margherita.

Perspectives on Environmental Law Scholarship: Essays on Purpose, Shape and Direction. ed. / Ole W Pedersen. Cambridge University Press, 2018. p. 60-78.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter in a book

Harvard

Pieraccini, M 2018, (Un)-Making the Boundaries of Environmental Law Scholarship: Interdisciplinarity Beyond the Social Sciences? in OW Pedersen (ed.), Perspectives on Environmental Law Scholarship: Essays on Purpose, Shape and Direction. Cambridge University Press, pp. 60-78. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108635929.005

APA

Pieraccini, M. (2018). (Un)-Making the Boundaries of Environmental Law Scholarship: Interdisciplinarity Beyond the Social Sciences? In O. W. Pedersen (Ed.), Perspectives on Environmental Law Scholarship: Essays on Purpose, Shape and Direction (pp. 60-78). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108635929.005

Vancouver

Pieraccini M. (Un)-Making the Boundaries of Environmental Law Scholarship: Interdisciplinarity Beyond the Social Sciences? In Pedersen OW, editor, Perspectives on Environmental Law Scholarship: Essays on Purpose, Shape and Direction. Cambridge University Press. 2018. p. 60-78 https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108635929.005

Author

Pieraccini, Margherita. / (Un)-Making the Boundaries of Environmental Law Scholarship : Interdisciplinarity Beyond the Social Sciences?. Perspectives on Environmental Law Scholarship: Essays on Purpose, Shape and Direction. editor / Ole W Pedersen. Cambridge University Press, 2018. pp. 60-78

Bibtex

@inbook{dae2d0d3f8024dbba652f0f595167aec,
title = "(Un)-Making the Boundaries of Environmental Law Scholarship: Interdisciplinarity Beyond the Social Sciences?",
abstract = "Public environmental law, many argue, is a young discipline originating in the late 1960s, when environmental problems became recognised by politics, policy and the public. Environmental law scholarship is therefore searching for greater recognition among more established legal subjects and in academia in general. To date, few academic voices have attempted to reflect on environmental law as a discipline discussing methodological and interdisciplinary challenges. This paper provides a contribution to this emerging literature by asking whether the boundaries of environmental law scholars can be pushed beyond the social sciences and whether interdisciplinary encounters with natural scientists can be made in the present context of U.K. Universities. It argues that, if interdisciplinary research between environmental law scholars and other social scientists is developing, the interactions between environmental law scholarship and natural scientists are more embryonic. The chapter sketches some of the institutional and epistemological challenges that arise from attempted interdisciplinary collaborations of this sort. More specifically, in relation to the institutional challenges it discusses first the rise of the {"}audit culture{"} in U.K. Universities and what the Research Excellence Framework (REF) means for such interdisciplinary collaborations and, second the rise of doctoral training partnerships with interdisciplinary pathways and cross-council scholarship attached to them and their limitations. As for the epistemological challenges, the extent to which knowledge formation is understood differently between the macro-sciences (natural sciences and social sciences) is discussed. Borrowing from the insights of the Science and Technology Studies (STS) literature, the chapter argues that the boundaries between the natural and the social are blurred and so they are between disciplines. It is argued that the demarcation of disciplines is more a product of current institutional practices and assertions of authority than an inherent epistemological difference between disciplines.",
author = "Margherita Pieraccini",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "8",
doi = "10.1017/9781108635929.005",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781108475242",
pages = "60--78",
editor = "Pedersen, {Ole W}",
booktitle = "Perspectives on Environmental Law Scholarship",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

RIS - suitable for import to EndNote

TY - CHAP

T1 - (Un)-Making the Boundaries of Environmental Law Scholarship

T2 - Interdisciplinarity Beyond the Social Sciences?

AU - Pieraccini, Margherita

PY - 2018/11/8

Y1 - 2018/11/8

N2 - Public environmental law, many argue, is a young discipline originating in the late 1960s, when environmental problems became recognised by politics, policy and the public. Environmental law scholarship is therefore searching for greater recognition among more established legal subjects and in academia in general. To date, few academic voices have attempted to reflect on environmental law as a discipline discussing methodological and interdisciplinary challenges. This paper provides a contribution to this emerging literature by asking whether the boundaries of environmental law scholars can be pushed beyond the social sciences and whether interdisciplinary encounters with natural scientists can be made in the present context of U.K. Universities. It argues that, if interdisciplinary research between environmental law scholars and other social scientists is developing, the interactions between environmental law scholarship and natural scientists are more embryonic. The chapter sketches some of the institutional and epistemological challenges that arise from attempted interdisciplinary collaborations of this sort. More specifically, in relation to the institutional challenges it discusses first the rise of the "audit culture" in U.K. Universities and what the Research Excellence Framework (REF) means for such interdisciplinary collaborations and, second the rise of doctoral training partnerships with interdisciplinary pathways and cross-council scholarship attached to them and their limitations. As for the epistemological challenges, the extent to which knowledge formation is understood differently between the macro-sciences (natural sciences and social sciences) is discussed. Borrowing from the insights of the Science and Technology Studies (STS) literature, the chapter argues that the boundaries between the natural and the social are blurred and so they are between disciplines. It is argued that the demarcation of disciplines is more a product of current institutional practices and assertions of authority than an inherent epistemological difference between disciplines.

AB - Public environmental law, many argue, is a young discipline originating in the late 1960s, when environmental problems became recognised by politics, policy and the public. Environmental law scholarship is therefore searching for greater recognition among more established legal subjects and in academia in general. To date, few academic voices have attempted to reflect on environmental law as a discipline discussing methodological and interdisciplinary challenges. This paper provides a contribution to this emerging literature by asking whether the boundaries of environmental law scholars can be pushed beyond the social sciences and whether interdisciplinary encounters with natural scientists can be made in the present context of U.K. Universities. It argues that, if interdisciplinary research between environmental law scholars and other social scientists is developing, the interactions between environmental law scholarship and natural scientists are more embryonic. The chapter sketches some of the institutional and epistemological challenges that arise from attempted interdisciplinary collaborations of this sort. More specifically, in relation to the institutional challenges it discusses first the rise of the "audit culture" in U.K. Universities and what the Research Excellence Framework (REF) means for such interdisciplinary collaborations and, second the rise of doctoral training partnerships with interdisciplinary pathways and cross-council scholarship attached to them and their limitations. As for the epistemological challenges, the extent to which knowledge formation is understood differently between the macro-sciences (natural sciences and social sciences) is discussed. Borrowing from the insights of the Science and Technology Studies (STS) literature, the chapter argues that the boundaries between the natural and the social are blurred and so they are between disciplines. It is argued that the demarcation of disciplines is more a product of current institutional practices and assertions of authority than an inherent epistemological difference between disciplines.

U2 - 10.1017/9781108635929.005

DO - 10.1017/9781108635929.005

M3 - Chapter in a book

SN - 9781108475242

SP - 60

EP - 78

BT - Perspectives on Environmental Law Scholarship

A2 - Pedersen, Ole W

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -