Updating the OMERACT Filter: Implications of Filter 2.0 to Select Outcome Instruments Through Assessment of "Truth": Content, Face, and Construct Validity

Peter Tugwell; Maarten Boers; Maria-Antonietta D'Agostino; Dorcas Beaton; Annelies Boonen; Clifton O Bingham; Ernest Choy; Philip G Conaghan; Maxime Dougados; Catia Duarte; Daniel E Furst; Francis Guillemin; Laure Gossec; Turid Heiberg; Désirée M van der Heijde; Sarah Hewlett; John R Kirwan; Tore K Kvien; Robert B Landewé; Philip J Mease; Mikkel Ostergaard; Lee Simon; Jasvinder A Singh; Vibeke Strand; George Wells

doi:10.3899/jrheum.131310

Updating the OMERACT Filter: Implications of Filter 2.0 to Select Outcome Instruments Through Assessment of "Truth": Content, Face, and Construct Validity

Peter Tugwell^*, Maarten Boers, Maria-Antonietta D'Agostino, Dorcas Beaton, Annelies Boonen, Clifton O Bingham, Ernest Choy, Philip G Conaghan, Maxime Dougados, Catia Duarte, Daniel E Furst, Francis Guillemin, Laure Gossec, Turid Heiberg, Désirée M van der Heijde, Sarah Hewlett, John R Kirwan, Tore K Kvien, Robert B Landewé, Philip J MeaseMikkel Ostergaard, Lee Simon, Jasvinder A Singh, Vibeke Strand, George Wells

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article (Academic Journal) › peer-review

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Filter provides guidelines for the development and validation of outcome measures for use in clinical research. The "Truth" section of the OMERACT Filter requires that criteria be met to demonstrate that the outcome instrument meets the criteria for content, face, and construct validity.

METHODS: Discussion groups critically reviewed a variety of ways in which case studies of current OMERACT Working Groups complied with the Truth component of the Filter and what issues remained to be resolved.

RESULTS: The case studies showed that there is broad agreement on criteria for meeting the Truth criteria through demonstration of content, face, and construct validity; however, several issues were identified that the Filter Working Group will need to address.

CONCLUSION: These issues will require resolution to reach consensus on how Truth will be assessed for the proposed Filter 2.0 framework, for instruments to be endorsed by OMERACT.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1000-1004
Number of pages	5
Journal	Journal of Rheumatology
Volume	41
Issue number	5
Early online date	1 May 2014
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.131310
Publication status	Published - May 2014

Keywords

Construct validity
Content validity
Face validity
Omeract
Outcome and process assessment
Randomized controlled trials

Access to Document

10.3899/jrheum.131310

Handle.net

Persistent link

Cite this

Tugwell, P., Boers, M., D'Agostino, M.-A., Beaton, D., Boonen, A., Bingham, C. O., Choy, E., Conaghan, P. G., Dougados, M., Duarte, C., Furst, D. E., Guillemin, F., Gossec, L., Heiberg, T., van der Heijde, D. M., Hewlett, S., Kirwan, J. R., Kvien, T. K., Landewé, R. B., ... Wells, G. (2014). Updating the OMERACT Filter: Implications of Filter 2.0 to Select Outcome Instruments Through Assessment of "Truth": Content, Face, and Construct Validity. Journal of Rheumatology, 41(5), 1000-1004. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.131310

@article{8ea8582d797648f68d68e7d37f180beb,

title = "Updating the OMERACT Filter: Implications of Filter 2.0 to Select Outcome Instruments Through Assessment of {"}Truth{"}: Content, Face, and Construct Validity",

abstract = "OBJECTIVE: The Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Filter provides guidelines for the development and validation of outcome measures for use in clinical research. The {"}Truth{"} section of the OMERACT Filter requires that criteria be met to demonstrate that the outcome instrument meets the criteria for content, face, and construct validity.METHODS: Discussion groups critically reviewed a variety of ways in which case studies of current OMERACT Working Groups complied with the Truth component of the Filter and what issues remained to be resolved.RESULTS: The case studies showed that there is broad agreement on criteria for meeting the Truth criteria through demonstration of content, face, and construct validity; however, several issues were identified that the Filter Working Group will need to address.CONCLUSION: These issues will require resolution to reach consensus on how Truth will be assessed for the proposed Filter 2.0 framework, for instruments to be endorsed by OMERACT.",

keywords = "Construct validity, Content validity, Face validity, Omeract, Outcome and process assessment, Randomized controlled trials",

author = "Peter Tugwell and Maarten Boers and Maria-Antonietta D'Agostino and Dorcas Beaton and Annelies Boonen and Bingham, {Clifton O} and Ernest Choy and Conaghan, {Philip G} and Maxime Dougados and Catia Duarte and Furst, {Daniel E} and Francis Guillemin and Laure Gossec and Turid Heiberg and {van der Heijde}, {D{\'e}sir{\'e}e M} and Sarah Hewlett and Kirwan, {John R} and Kvien, {Tore K} and Landew{\'e}, {Robert B} and Mease, {Philip J} and Mikkel Ostergaard and Lee Simon and Singh, {Jasvinder A} and Vibeke Strand and George Wells",

year = "2014",

month = may,

doi = "10.3899/jrheum.131310",

language = "English",

volume = "41",

pages = "1000--1004",

journal = "Journal of Rheumatology",

issn = "0315-162X",

publisher = "Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Company",

number = "5",

}

Tugwell, P, Boers, M, D'Agostino, M-A, Beaton, D, Boonen, A, Bingham, CO, Choy, E, Conaghan, PG, Dougados, M, Duarte, C, Furst, DE, Guillemin, F, Gossec, L, Heiberg, T, van der Heijde, DM, Hewlett, S, Kirwan, JR, Kvien, TK, Landewé, RB, Mease, PJ, Ostergaard, M, Simon, L, Singh, JA, Strand, V & Wells, G 2014, 'Updating the OMERACT Filter: Implications of Filter 2.0 to Select Outcome Instruments Through Assessment of "Truth": Content, Face, and Construct Validity', Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 1000-1004. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.131310

Updating the OMERACT Filter: Implications of Filter 2.0 to Select Outcome Instruments Through Assessment of "Truth": Content, Face, and Construct Validity. / Tugwell, Peter; Boers, Maarten; D'Agostino, Maria-Antonietta et al.
In: Journal of Rheumatology, Vol. 41, No. 5, 05.2014, p. 1000-1004.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article (Academic Journal) › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Updating the OMERACT Filter

T2 - Implications of Filter 2.0 to Select Outcome Instruments Through Assessment of "Truth": Content, Face, and Construct Validity

AU - Tugwell, Peter

AU - Boers, Maarten

AU - D'Agostino, Maria-Antonietta

AU - Beaton, Dorcas

AU - Boonen, Annelies

AU - Bingham, Clifton O

AU - Choy, Ernest

AU - Conaghan, Philip G

AU - Dougados, Maxime

AU - Duarte, Catia

AU - Furst, Daniel E

AU - Guillemin, Francis

AU - Gossec, Laure

AU - Heiberg, Turid

AU - van der Heijde, Désirée M

AU - Hewlett, Sarah

AU - Kirwan, John R

AU - Kvien, Tore K

AU - Landewé, Robert B

AU - Mease, Philip J

AU - Ostergaard, Mikkel

AU - Simon, Lee

AU - Singh, Jasvinder A

AU - Strand, Vibeke

AU - Wells, George

PY - 2014/5

Y1 - 2014/5

N2 - OBJECTIVE: The Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Filter provides guidelines for the development and validation of outcome measures for use in clinical research. The "Truth" section of the OMERACT Filter requires that criteria be met to demonstrate that the outcome instrument meets the criteria for content, face, and construct validity.METHODS: Discussion groups critically reviewed a variety of ways in which case studies of current OMERACT Working Groups complied with the Truth component of the Filter and what issues remained to be resolved.RESULTS: The case studies showed that there is broad agreement on criteria for meeting the Truth criteria through demonstration of content, face, and construct validity; however, several issues were identified that the Filter Working Group will need to address.CONCLUSION: These issues will require resolution to reach consensus on how Truth will be assessed for the proposed Filter 2.0 framework, for instruments to be endorsed by OMERACT.

AB - OBJECTIVE: The Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Filter provides guidelines for the development and validation of outcome measures for use in clinical research. The "Truth" section of the OMERACT Filter requires that criteria be met to demonstrate that the outcome instrument meets the criteria for content, face, and construct validity.METHODS: Discussion groups critically reviewed a variety of ways in which case studies of current OMERACT Working Groups complied with the Truth component of the Filter and what issues remained to be resolved.RESULTS: The case studies showed that there is broad agreement on criteria for meeting the Truth criteria through demonstration of content, face, and construct validity; however, several issues were identified that the Filter Working Group will need to address.CONCLUSION: These issues will require resolution to reach consensus on how Truth will be assessed for the proposed Filter 2.0 framework, for instruments to be endorsed by OMERACT.

KW - Construct validity

KW - Content validity

KW - Face validity

KW - Omeract

KW - Outcome and process assessment

KW - Randomized controlled trials

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84899720690&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3899/jrheum.131310

DO - 10.3899/jrheum.131310

M3 - Article (Academic Journal)

C2 - 24692531

SN - 0315-162X

VL - 41

SP - 1000

EP - 1004

JO - Journal of Rheumatology

JF - Journal of Rheumatology

IS - 5

ER -

Updating the OMERACT Filter: Implications of Filter 2.0 to Select Outcome Instruments Through Assessment of "Truth": Content, Face, and Construct Validity

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Handle.net

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this