Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Usability of an Automated System for Real-Time Monitoring of Shared Decision-Making for Surgery: Mixed Methods Evaluation

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article (Academic Journal) › peer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This aim of this study was to examine the usability of a novel, automated, real-time measurement system to monitor surgical patients’ experience of SDM. Specific objectives were to evaluate the measurement system’s i) effectiveness, ii) efficiency, and iii) user satisfaction amongst a large sample of surgical patients from a wide range of surgical specialties.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere46698
JournalJMIR
Volume11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 10 Apr 2024

Bibliographical note

©Christin Hoffmann, Kerry Avery, Rhiannon Macefield, Tadeáš Dvořák, Val Snelgrove, Jane Blazeby, Della Hopkins, Shireen Hickey, Ben Gibbison, Leila Rooshenas, Adam Williams, Jonathan Aning, Hilary L Bekker, Angus GK McNair, The ALPACA Study Team. Originally published in JMIR Human Factors (https://humanfactors.jmir.org), 10.04.2024.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Adult
  • Humans
  • Research Design
  • Benchmarking
  • Books
  • Health Policy
  • Internet

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Usability of an Automated System for Real-Time Monitoring of Shared Decision-Making for Surgery: Mixed Methods Evaluation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this