Abstract
Discusses, with reference to Re Dee Valley Group Plc (Ch D), how dissenting shareholders in a takeover may use or abuse their powers to defeat the move by a share-splitting exercise. Reviews the regulation of member transfer schemes, the court's approach to whether share-splitting was objectionable, and the role of class interests. Proposes reforms to clarify how the discretion, authority and accountability of the parties should be determined.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 282-303 |
Journal | Journal of Business Law |
Volume | 4 |
Publication status | Accepted/In press - 18 Mar 2018 |
Keywords
- Class meetings
- Schemes of arrangement
- Share transfers
- Shareholders' rights
- Takeovers
- Voting rights