Skip to content

Variation in the recall of socially rewarding information and depressive symptom severity: a prospective cohort study

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)489-498
Number of pages10
JournalActa Psychiatrica Scandinavica
Volume135
Issue number5
Early online date4 Apr 2017
DOIs
DateAccepted/In press - 8 Mar 2017
DateE-pub ahead of print - 4 Apr 2017
DatePublished (current) - May 2017

Abstract

Objective

To test the association between recall for socially rewarding (positive) and/or socially critical (negative) information and depressive symptoms.

Method

Cohort study of people who had visited UK primary care in the past year reporting depressive symptoms (N = 558, 69% female). Positive and negative recall was assessed at three time-points, 2 weeks apart, using a computerised task. Depressive symptoms were assessed at four time-points using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). Analyses were conducted using multilevel models.

Results

Concurrently we found evidence that, for every increase in two positive words recalled, depressive symptoms reduced by 0.6 (95% CI −1.0 to −0.2) BDI points. This association was not affected by adjustment for confounders. There was no evidence of an association between negative recall and depressive symptoms (−0.1, 95% CI −0.5 to 0.3). Longitudinally, we found more evidence that positive recall was associated with reduced depressive symptoms than vice versa.

Conclusion

People with more severe depressive symptoms recall less positive information, even if their recall of negative information is unaltered. Clinicians could put more emphasis on encouraging patients to recall positive, socially rewarding information, rather than trying to change negative interpretations of events that have already occurred.

    Structured keywords

  • Brain and Behaviour
  • Tobacco and Alcohol

    Research areas

  • depression, emotional memory, epidemiology

Download statistics

No data available

Documents

Documents

  • Full-text PDF (final published version)

    Rights statement: This is the final published version of the article (version of record). It first appeared online via Wiley at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/acps.12729/abstract. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.

    Final published version, 186 KB, PDF document

    Licence: CC BY-NC

DOI

View research connections

Related faculties, schools or groups