Abstract
This article investigated the role of the recognition criterion in the verbal overshadowing effect (VOE). In 3 experiments, people witnessed an event, verbally described a perpetrator, and then attempted identification. The authors found in Experiment 1, which included a "not present" response option and both perpetrator-present (PP) and perpetrator-absent (PA) lineups, an increased reluctance to identify a person from both lineup types after verbalization. Experiment 2 incorporated a forced-choice procedure, and the authors found no effect of verbalization on identification performance. Experiment 3 replicated the essential aspects of these results. Consequently, the VOE may reflect a change in recognition criterion rather than a changed processing style or alteration of the underlying memory trace. This conclusion was confirmed by computational modeling of the data.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 739-755 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jul 2004 |
Research Groups and Themes
- Memory
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver