Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Visual preferences for communicating modelling: a global analysis of COVID-19 policy and decision makers

Liza Hadley*, Caylyn Rich, Alex Tasker, Olivier Restif, Sebastian Funk

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Effective communication of modelling results to policy and decision makers has been a longstanding challenge in times of crises. This communication takes many forms - visualisations, reports, presentations - and requires careful consideration to ensure accurate maintenance of the key scientific messages. Science-to-policy communication is further exacerbated when presenting fundamentally uncertain forms of science such as infectious disease modelling and other types of modelled evidence, something which has been understudied. Here we assess the communication and visualisation of infectious disease modelling results to national COVID-19 policy and decision makers in 13 different countries. We present a synthesis of recommendations on what aspects of visuals, graphs, and plots policymakers found to be most helpful in their COVID-19 response work. This work serves as a first evidence base for developing guidelines on the communication and translation of infectious disease modelling into policy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)924-934
Number of pages11
JournalInfectious Disease Modelling
Volume10
Issue number3
Early online date23 Apr 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Authors

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Communication
  • Modelling
  • Outbreak
  • Policy
  • Visualisation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Visual preferences for communicating modelling: a global analysis of COVID-19 policy and decision makers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this