‘Voice’ and ‘Choice’ in Modern Working Practices: Problems with the Taylor Review

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)
239 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In July 2017, the Taylor Review on ‘Modern Working Practices’ was published. Led by Matthew Taylor, the Review aimed to consider the implications of new emerging business models for both worker rights and employer obligations. Its recommendations seem ill-informed, methodologically unsound and, ultimately, unlikely to address the widespread deprivation of workers’ rights within the ‘gig’ economy and contemporary workplace. We shape our critique of the Taylor approach by reference to the constructions of ‘choice’ used in the Review and the limited scope permitted for worker ‘voice’. In particular, we observe an evasion of international labour standards relevant to ‘decent work’ and a lack of attention n to fundamental human rights. Identifying methodological flaws in the Report and focusing on three central areas of reform: employment status; zero hours contracts; and workers’ voice and representation, this article critically analyses a number of the proposals put forwards, concluding that many of the Taylor Review recommendations are not only problematic, but dangerous, with potentially serious deregulatory repercussions for UK workers if actioned upon and implemented by the current Government.
Original languageEnglish
Article numberdwx028
Pages (from-to)46-75
Number of pages30
JournalIndustrial Law Journal
Volume47
Issue number1
Early online date29 Jan 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Mar 2018

Structured keywords

  • Perspectives on Work
  • LAW Centre for Law at Work

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of '‘Voice’ and ‘Choice’ in Modern Working Practices: Problems with the Taylor Review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this