@techreport{e01b87c5d0ae42338b03c74b5bd6dac6,
title = "Watching the Watchmaker:: On Regulating the Social in Lieu of the Technical",
abstract = "This paper looks at the problem of expertise in regulation by examining the Federal Aviation Administration{\textquoteright}s (FAA) {\textquoteleft}type-certification{\textquoteright} process, through which they evaluate new designs of civil aircraft. It notes that the FAA delegate a large amount of this work to the manufacturers themselves, and discusses why they do this by invoking arguments from the sociology of science and technology. It suggests that – contrary to popular portrayal – regulators of {\textquoteleft}high{\textquoteright} technologies face an inevitable epistemic barrier when making technological assessments, which forces them to delegate technical questions to people with more tacit knowledge, and hence to {\textquoteleft}regulate{\textquoteright} at a distance by evaluating {\textquoteleft}trust{\textquoteright} rather than {\textquoteleft}technology{\textquoteright}. It then unravels some of the implications of this and its relation to our theories of regulation and {\textquoteleft}regulatory capture{\textquoteright}.",
keywords = "Regulatory capture, Aviation regulation, Federal Aviation Administration",
author = "John Downer",
year = "2009",
month = jun,
language = "English",
isbn = "9780853283966",
volume = "54",
series = "CARR Discussion Papers",
publisher = "London School of Economics: Centre for Analysis of Risk and Regulation",
number = "54",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "London School of Economics: Centre for Analysis of Risk and Regulation",
}