Wellbeing in Secondary Education (WISE) Study to Improve the Mental Health and Wellbeing of Teachers: A Complex System Approach to Understanding Intervention Acceptability

Rhiannon Evans*, Sarah L Bell, Rowan Brockman, Rona M Campbell, Lauren Copeland, Harri Fisher, Tamsin Ford, Sarah K Harding, Jillian M Powell, Nicholas L Turner, Judi L Kidger

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)
204 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Teaching staff report poorer mental health and wellbeing than the general working population. Intervention to address this issue is imperative, as poor wellbeing is associated with burnout, presenteeism, and adverse student mental health outcomes. The Wellbeing in Secondary Education (WISE) intervention is a secondary school-based programme aimed at improving the mental health and wellbeing of teachers and students. There are three components: awareness-raising for staff; a peer support service delivered by staff trained in Mental Health First Aid (MHFA); and Schools and Colleges Mental Health First Aid (MHFA) training for teachers. A cluster randomised controlled trial with integrated process and economic evaluation was conducted with 25 secondary schools in the UK (2016–2018). The intervention was largely ineffective in improving teacher mental health and wellbeing. This paper reports process evaluation data on acceptability to help understand this outcome. It adopts a complex systems perspective, exploring how acceptability is a dynamic and contextually contingent concept. Data sources were as follows: interviews with funders (n = 3); interviews with MHFA trainers (n = 6); focus groups with peer supporters (n = 8); interviews with headteachers (n = 12); and focus groups with teachers trained in Schools and Colleges MHFA (n = 7). Results indicated that WISE intervention components were largely acceptable. Initially, the school system was responsive, as it had reached a ‘tipping point’ and was prepared to address teacher mental health. However, as the intervention interacted with the complexities of the school context, acceptability became more ambiguous. The intervention was seen to be largely inadequate in addressing the structural determinants of teacher mental health and wellbeing (e.g. complex student and staff needs, workload, and system culture). Future teacher mental health interventions need to focus on coupling skills training and support with whole school elements that tackle the systemic drivers of the problem.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)922-933
Number of pages12
JournalPrevention Science
Volume23
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 19 Mar 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This study was funded by the National Institute for Health Research’s Public Health Research programme 13/164/06. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or Department of Health and Social Care. The intervention costs were covered by Public Health England, Public Health Wales, and Bristol City Council. This work was supported by The Centre for Development, Evaluation, Complexity and Implementation in Public Health Improvement (DECIPHer) funded by Welsh Government through Health and Care Research Wales.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).

Keywords

  • Adolescents
  • Teacher
  • School
  • Process evaluation
  • Mental health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Wellbeing in Secondary Education (WISE) Study to Improve the Mental Health and Wellbeing of Teachers: A Complex System Approach to Understanding Intervention Acceptability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this