What is modern about sovereign wealth funds?: A reply to Pete Moore

Gordon L Clark; Adam D Dixon; Ashby Monk

doi:10.1515/bap-2013-0026

What is modern about sovereign wealth funds? A reply to Pete Moore

Gordon L Clark
, Adam D Dixon
, Ashby Monk

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article (Academic Journal)

Abstract

We welcome the opportunity to respond to Pete Moore’s comments on our paper. In doing so, we address the central issue raised by Moore concerning our use of the term “modern” in our analysis of the origin, structure, and management of Gulf states’ sovereign wealth funds. As it turns out, our use of the term modern is complex and multifaceted; we hope to show that the issue raised by Pete Moore runs in a variety of directions and is not so easily resolved, as he suggests.

Original language	English
Journal	Business and Politics
Early online date	7 Nov 2013
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1515/bap-2013-0026
Publication status	Published - 2013

Access to Document

10.1515/bap-2013-0026

Handle.net

Persistent link

Cite this

@article{52bdef5a7e3344dcb948a85c0f3cb31b,

title = "What is modern about sovereign wealth funds?: A reply to Pete Moore",

abstract = "We welcome the opportunity to respond to Pete Moore{\textquoteright}s comments on our paper. In doing so, we address the central issue raised by Moore concerning our use of the term “modern” in our analysis of the origin, structure, and management of Gulf states{\textquoteright} sovereign wealth funds. As it turns out, our use of the term modern is complex and multifaceted; we hope to show that the issue raised by Pete Moore runs in a variety of directions and is not so easily resolved, as he suggests.",

author = "Clark, \{Gordon L\} and Dixon, \{Adam D\} and Ashby Monk",

year = "2013",

doi = "10.1515/bap-2013-0026",

language = "English",

journal = "Business and Politics",

issn = "1469-3569",

publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What is modern about sovereign wealth funds?

T2 - A reply to Pete Moore

AU - Clark, Gordon L

AU - Dixon, Adam D

AU - Monk, Ashby

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - We welcome the opportunity to respond to Pete Moore’s comments on our paper. In doing so, we address the central issue raised by Moore concerning our use of the term “modern” in our analysis of the origin, structure, and management of Gulf states’ sovereign wealth funds. As it turns out, our use of the term modern is complex and multifaceted; we hope to show that the issue raised by Pete Moore runs in a variety of directions and is not so easily resolved, as he suggests.

AB - We welcome the opportunity to respond to Pete Moore’s comments on our paper. In doing so, we address the central issue raised by Moore concerning our use of the term “modern” in our analysis of the origin, structure, and management of Gulf states’ sovereign wealth funds. As it turns out, our use of the term modern is complex and multifaceted; we hope to show that the issue raised by Pete Moore runs in a variety of directions and is not so easily resolved, as he suggests.

U2 - 10.1515/bap-2013-0026

DO - 10.1515/bap-2013-0026

M3 - Article (Academic Journal)

SN - 1469-3569

JO - Business and Politics

JF - Business and Politics

ER -

What is modern about sovereign wealth funds? A reply to Pete Moore

Abstract

Access to Document

Handle.net

Fingerprint

Cite this