What Makes a Good EU Presidency? Italy and Ireland compared

L Quaglia, E Moxon Browne

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

    50 Citations (Scopus)


    What makes a 'good' EU presidency? A comparison between the two most recent Italian and Irish experiences in office can be instrumental in evaluating the crucial factors that affect presidency performance. The argument is developed in three main stages. Firstly, four key roles are selected in order to benchmark presidencies. Secondly, these roles are applied to the empirical record as criteria to devise a score-card of the two presidencies under consideration. Thirdly, presidency-specific factors are elicited and analysed, arguing that intangible assets, such as knowledge of EU affairs (process expertise, content expertise and information); political credibility and reputation; and general attitudes towards European integration, are crucial in performing the roles of president-in-office effectively and legitimately.
    Translated title of the contributionWhat Makes a Good EU Presidency? Italy and Ireland compared
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)349 - 368
    Number of pages20
    JournalJournal of Common Market Studies
    Volume44 (2)
    Publication statusPublished - Jun 2006

    Bibliographical note

    Publisher: Blackwell


    Dive into the research topics of 'What Makes a Good EU Presidency? Italy and Ireland compared'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this