Abstract
The ascent of water from the soil to the leaves of vascular plants, described by the study of plant hydraulics, regulates ecosystem responses to environmental forcing and recovery from stress periods. Several approaches to model plant hydraulics have been proposed. In this study, we introduce four different versions of plant hydraulics representations in the terrestrial biosphere model T&C to understand the significance of plant hydraulics to ecosystem functioning. We tested representations of plant hydraulics, investigating plant water capacitance, and long-term xylem damages following drought. The four models we tested were a combination of representations including or neglecting capacitance and including or neglecting xylem damage legacies. Using the models at six case studies spanning semiarid to tropical ecosystems, we quantify how plant xylem flow, plant water storage and long-term xylem damage can modulate overall water and carbon dynamics across multiple time scales. We show that as drought develops, models with plant hydraulics predict a slower onset of plant water stress, and a diurnal variability of water and carbon fluxes closer to observations. Plant water storage was found to be particularly important for the diurnal dynamics of water and carbon fluxes, with models that include plant water capacitance yielding better results. Models including permanent damage to conducting plant tissues show an additional significant drought legacy effect, limiting plant productivity during the recovery phase following major droughts. However, when considering ecosystem responses to the observed climate variability, plant hydraulic modules alone cannot significantly improve the overall model performance, even though they reproduce more realistic water and carbon dynamics. This opens new avenues for model development, explicitly linking plant hydraulics with additional ecosystem processes, such as plant phenology and improved carbon allocation algorithms.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | e17022 |
Number of pages | 23 |
Journal | Global Change Biology |
Volume | 30 |
Issue number | 1 |
Early online date | 14 Nov 2023 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 8 Dec 2023 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:AP acknowledges funding from NERC (NE/S003495/1, NE/X01889X/1, NE/Y000471/1), MGDK acknowledges funding from the UK Natural Environment Research Council (NE/W010003/1) and the Australian Research Council Discovery Grants (Grant DP190102025 and DP190101823), MEBS acknowledges support from the Australian Research Council (ARC) Centre of Excellence for Climate Extremes (CE170100023) and from the ARC Discovery Grant (DP190101823). SF acknowledges the support of Singapore's Ministry of Education (MoE) under its Academic Research Fund Tier 2, Project ID: MOE‐000379‐00/MOE‐000379‐01, Award Number: MOE‐T2EP50122‐0004. We also thank the three anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments that significantly improved our manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors. Global Change Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Keywords
- ecosystem recovery
- ecosystem responses
- plant hydraulics
- terrestrial biosphere model
- water stress