This paper argues that redundancy in engineering, should be understood as a ‘design paradigm’ that frames regulatory assessments and interpretations of all complex technical systems, profoundly shaping decisions and judgements about modern technologies. It will further argue that the ‘redundancy paradigm’ used by regulators contains epistemic ambiguities that lead to imperfect predictions about the effects of redundancy in practice. By deconstructing the logic of redundancy in relation to aviation regulation, this paper illuminates much wider issues about technology governance.
|Place of Publication||London|
|Publisher||London School of Economics: Centre for Analysis of Risk and Regulation|
|Number of pages||24|
|Publication status||Published - May 2009|
- Aviation regulation