Skip to content

When the larger objective matters more: support workers’ epistemic and deontic authority over adult service-users

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1549-1567
Number of pages19
JournalSociology of Health and Illness
Volume41
Issue number8
Early online date18 Jun 2019
DOIs
DateAccepted/In press - 19 May 2019
DateE-pub ahead of print - 18 Jun 2019
DatePublished (current) - 8 Nov 2019

Abstract

We report on how support workers sometimes over‐ride the wishes of people living with cognitive impairments. This can happen when they are both involved in some project (such as an institutionally‐managed game, a physical journey, an educational activity and so on). The support worker might use their deontic authority (to propose, decide or announce future actions) to do things that advance the over‐arching project, in spite of proposals for what are cast as diversions from the person with impairments. They might also use their epistemic authority (their greater knowledge or cognitive capacity) to trump their clients’ choices and preferences in subordinate projects. Not orienting to suggested courses of actions is generally interactionally dispreferred and troublesome, but, although the providers do sometimes orient to their actions as balking their clients’ wishes, they usually do not, and encounter little resistance. We discuss how people with disabilities may resist or palliate such loss of control, and the dilemmas that support staff face in carrying out their duties.

    Research areas

  • Conversation Analysis, deontics, empowerment, epistemics, Intellectual impairment, learning disability, support

Download statistics

No data available

Documents

Documents

  • Full-text PDF (final published version)

    Rights statement: This is the final published version of the article (version of record). It first appeared online via Wiley at https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1467-9566.12964 . Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.

    Final published version, 1.94 MB, PDF document

    Licence: CC BY

DOI

View research connections

Related faculties, schools or groups