Why additional presentations help identify a stimulus

D Guest, C Kent, JS Adelman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)


Nosofsky (1983) reported that additional stimulus presentations within a trial increase discriminability in absolute identification, suggesting that each presentation creates an independent stimulus representation, but it remains unclear whether exposure duration or the formation of independent representations improves discrimination in such conditions. Experiment 1 replicated Nosofsky's result. Experiments 2 (masking the ISI between two-presentations) and 3 (manipulating stimulus duration without changing number of presentations or overall trial duration) ruled out an explanation in terms of extended opportunities for stimulus sampling, from either a sensory buffer during additional ISIs or increased stimulus exposure, respectively. Experiment 4 (comparing two and three-presentations, other factors controlled) provided some limited additional support for Nosofsky's original claim that additional stimulus presentations can create either independent or duplicate representations. Experiments 5 and 6 (both manipulating ISI) demonstrated that a key factor in the additional stimulus presentation effect is the overall trial duration. We discuss the results in relation to models of absolute identification, their relative emphasis on stimulus sampling versus response selection, and the mechanisms by which duplicate representations could be created.
Translated title of the contributionWhy additional presentations help identify a stimulus
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1609 - 1630
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - 2010


Dive into the research topics of 'Why additional presentations help identify a stimulus'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this