Why so serious? Theorising playful model-driven group decision support with situated affectivity

Katharina Burger, Leroy White, Mike Yearworth

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)
225 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

An integrative approach to theorising behavioural, affective and cognitive processes in model-driven group decision support (GDS) interventions is needed to gain insight into the (micro-)processes by which outcomes are accomplished. This paper proposes that the theoretical lens of situated affectivity, grounded in recent extensions of scaffolded mind models, is suitable to understand the performativity of affective micro-processes in model-driven GDS interventions. An illustrative vignette of a humorous micro-moment in a group decision workshop is presented to reveal the performativity of extended affective scaffolding processes for group decision development. The lens of situated affectivity constitutes a novel approach for the study of interventionist practice in the context of group decision making (and negotiation). An outlook with opportunities for future research is offered to facilitate an integrated approach to the study of cognitive-affective and behavioural micro-processes in model-driven GDS interventions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)789–810
Number of pages23
JournalGroup Decision and Negotiation
Volume27
Issue number5
Early online date15 Feb 2018
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 15 Feb 2018

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Why so serious? Theorising playful model-driven group decision support with situated affectivity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this