Why Solar Radiation Management Geoengineering and Democracy Won't Mix

Bronislaw Szerszynski, Matthew Kearnes, Phil Macnaghten, Richard Owen, Jack Stilgoe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

71 Citations (Scopus)
230 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this paper we argue that recent policy treatments of solar radiation management (SRM) have insufficiently addressed its potential implications for contemporary political systems. Exploring the emerging ‘social constitution’ of SRM, we outline four reasons why this is likely to pose immense challenges to liberal democratic politics: that the unequal distribution of and uncertainties about SRM impacts will cause conflicts within existing institutions; that SRM will act at the planetary level and necessitate autocratic governance; that the motivations for SRM will always be plural and unstable; and that SRM will become conditioned by economic forces.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2809-2816
Number of pages8
JournalEnvironment and Planning A
Volume45
Issue number12
Early online date1 Dec 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2013

Keywords

  • solar radiation management
  • geoengineering
  • governance
  • politics
  • democracy
  • social constitution of technology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Why Solar Radiation Management Geoengineering and Democracy Won't Mix'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this