Why, when and how do secondary-care clinicians have emergency care and treatment planning conversations? Qualitative findings from the ReSPECT Evaluation study

Cynthia A Ochieng; Karin Eli; Claire Hawkes; Gavin D. Perkins; Anne Marie Slowther; Frances Griffiths

doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.01.013

Why, when and how do secondary-care clinicians have emergency care and treatment planning conversations? Qualitative findings from the ReSPECT Evaluation study

Cynthia A Ochieng, Karin Eli^*, Claire Hawkes, Gavin D. Perkins, Anne Marie Slowther, Frances Griffiths

^*Corresponding author for this work

Bristol Medical School (PHS)

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article (Academic Journal) › peer-review

22 Citations (Scopus)

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	343-350
Number of pages	8
Journal	Resuscitation
Volume	162
Early online date	19 Jan 2021
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.01.013
Publication status	Published - May 2021

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This article presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) under the Health Services and Delivery Research programme (project number 15/15/09). The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. The authors acknowledge the support of the National Institute for Health Research Clinical Research Network (NIHR CRN) and Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) West Midlands.

Funding Information:
GDP and CAH are members of the ReSPECT national working group. CB is the clinical lead for ReSPECT in the Resuscitation Council (UK). PMF is co-chair of the ReSPECT national working group. AMS, FG, CAH and GDP received grants from the UK National Institute of Health Research during the study.

Funding Information:
GDP and CAH are members of the ReSPECT national working group. CB is the clinical lead for ReSPECT in the Resuscitation Council (UK). PMF is co-chair of the ReSPECT national working group. AMS, FG, CAH and GDP received grants from the UK National Institute of Health Research during the study.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021

Access to Document

10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.01.013

Handle.net

Persistent link

Cite this

@article{d8983ff37f2446d09b4db8c446fd143d,

title = "Why, when and how do secondary-care clinicians have emergency care and treatment planning conversations? Qualitative findings from the ReSPECT Evaluation study",

author = "Ochieng, {Cynthia A} and Karin Eli and Claire Hawkes and Perkins, {Gavin D.} and Slowther, {Anne Marie} and Frances Griffiths",

note = "Funding Information: This article presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) under the Health Services and Delivery Research programme (project number 15/15/09). The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. The authors acknowledge the support of the National Institute for Health Research Clinical Research Network (NIHR CRN) and Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) West Midlands. Funding Information: GDP and CAH are members of the ReSPECT national working group. CB is the clinical lead for ReSPECT in the Resuscitation Council (UK). PMF is co-chair of the ReSPECT national working group. AMS, FG, CAH and GDP received grants from the UK National Institute of Health Research during the study. Funding Information: GDP and CAH are members of the ReSPECT national working group. CB is the clinical lead for ReSPECT in the Resuscitation Council (UK). PMF is co-chair of the ReSPECT national working group. AMS, FG, CAH and GDP received grants from the UK National Institute of Health Research during the study. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021",

year = "2021",

month = may,

doi = "10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.01.013",

language = "English",

volume = "162",

pages = "343--350",

journal = "Resuscitation",

issn = "0300-9572",

publisher = "North-Holland Publishing Company",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why, when and how do secondary-care clinicians have emergency care and treatment planning conversations? Qualitative findings from the ReSPECT Evaluation study

AU - Ochieng, Cynthia A

AU - Eli, Karin

AU - Hawkes, Claire

AU - Perkins, Gavin D.

AU - Slowther, Anne Marie

AU - Griffiths, Frances

N1 - Funding Information: This article presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) under the Health Services and Delivery Research programme (project number 15/15/09). The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. The authors acknowledge the support of the National Institute for Health Research Clinical Research Network (NIHR CRN) and Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) West Midlands. Funding Information: GDP and CAH are members of the ReSPECT national working group. CB is the clinical lead for ReSPECT in the Resuscitation Council (UK). PMF is co-chair of the ReSPECT national working group. AMS, FG, CAH and GDP received grants from the UK National Institute of Health Research during the study. Funding Information: GDP and CAH are members of the ReSPECT national working group. CB is the clinical lead for ReSPECT in the Resuscitation Council (UK). PMF is co-chair of the ReSPECT national working group. AMS, FG, CAH and GDP received grants from the UK National Institute of Health Research during the study. Publisher Copyright: © 2021

PY - 2021/5

Y1 - 2021/5

U2 - 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.01.013

DO - 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.01.013

M3 - Article (Academic Journal)

C2 - 33482270

SN - 0300-9572

VL - 162

SP - 343

EP - 350

JO - Resuscitation

JF - Resuscitation

ER -