Abstract
This article demonstrates the underappreciated import and potential of Peter Winch’s The Idea of a Social Science and its Relation to Philosophy, a classic work published sixty-five years ago. Its aim is not simply to correct misunderstandings of Winch but to rehabilitate the text as indispensable for understanding past and present woes and cementing the future of the sociological endeavour. I reconstruct and defend the claims put forth by Winch and then explicitly draw out their implications to demonstrate the incoherence of the predominant disciplinary self-image which sees sociology as having a method and/or critical thinking prerogative. This problematic self-conception is jeopardising the coherence and wider relevance of sociology and is responsible for its perennial difficulties in articulating a mode of discourse which can be seen as cogent by the public. A defensible alternative sees sociology as a second-order study of practices which is premised on a conceptually accurate relation to those practices and the criteria and abilities of understanding, description, explanation and criticism they afford. This conception can support the reconfiguration of existing forms of sociological inquiry as well as the development of new ones.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | European Journal of Social Theory |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 27 Oct 2023 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© The Author(s) 2023.
Research Groups and Themes
- Social and Political Theory
Keywords
- Peter Winch
- criteria of understanding
- conceptual accuracy
- second-order inquiry
- distinctiveness of sociology
- philosophy