Abstract
This article undertakes a reading of Andrei Tarkovsky's 1979 film Stalker that runs, for the most part, against the grain of the director's own pronouncements on the film. My focus is on a character study of the Stalker himself, and the consequences of his most unattractive characteristics: his manipulativeness, his petulance, and his self-pity. Rather than seeing the Stalker as an emblem of pure faith I explore the possibility that he is a quasi-tragic figure trapped by his own myopic idolatry. I also contrast the Stalker's lack of self-awareness with Stalker's reflexivity; I argue that interpreting the film in this way casts a fresh light on its crucial themes of faith and belief. I attempt ultimately, to show that focussing on these negative characteristics reveals a perhaps surprising affinity between Stalker and the philosophical investigations into agency and self-knowledge that Robert Pippin has conducted by means of a study of film noir.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Journal | Quarterly Review of Film and Video |
| Early online date | 16 Apr 2019 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 16 Apr 2019 |
Keywords
- Tarkovsky
- Stalker
- self-pity
- reflexivity
- film noir
- film-philosophy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '"You Can't Imagine How Terrible It Is to Make the Wrong Choice"—Faith, Agency and Self-Pity in Andrei Tarkovsky's Stalker'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver