Abstract
This paper will first explain the standard Gricean account, with how it defines speaker-meaning and sentence-meaning. It will then provide an evaluation in terms of the typical problems faced by the account and show how it is unable to circumvent those issues in a satisfactory manner. It would discuss the short-comings of the account, and in doing so highlight what has to be changed.From this, it would move to discuss a division between content-meaning and context-meaning as a method of handling such problems. It will define each type of meaning, as well as how they interact with one another. It will then return to the problems of speaker-meaning prior and show how this division allows us to avoid the problems entirely.
With that in place, it will show progressively how we might ground sentence-meaning in experience, and in doing so argue that such a method provides compositionality and the requisite ability to handle content-meaning and context-meaning simultaneously. It will raise the problems of sentence-meaning faced by the Gricean account, and show how it can overcome then as well.
Date of Award | 8 May 2018 |
---|---|
Original language | English |
Awarding Institution |
|
Supervisor | Samir Okasha (Supervisor) & Anthony J Everett (Supervisor) |