Skip to content

A Comparison of Health Professionals’ and Patients’ Views of the Importance of Outcomes of Bariatric Surgery

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2738-2746
Number of pages9
JournalObesity Surgery
Issue number11
Early online date2 May 2016
DateAccepted/In press - 15 Apr 2016
DateE-pub ahead of print - 2 May 2016
DatePublished (current) - Nov 2016


Background: A comprehensive evaluation of bariatric surgery is required to inform decision-making. This will include measures of benefit and risk. It is possible that stakeholders involved with surgery value these outcomes differently, although this has not previously been explored. This study aimed to investigate and compare how professionals and patients prioritise outcomes of bariatric surgery.
Methods: Systematic reviews and qualitative interviews created an exhaustive list of outcomes. This informed the development of a 130-item questionnaire, structured in four sections (complications of surgery; clinical effectiveness; signs, symptoms, and other measures; quality of life). Health professionals and patients rated the importance of each item on a 1-9 scale. Items rated 8-9 by at least 70% of participants were considered prioritised. Items prioritised in each section were compared between professionals and patients, and interrater agreement assessed using kappa statistics (ĸ).
Results: 168/459 professionals (36.6%), and 90/465 patients (19.4%) completed the questionnaire. Professionals and patients prioritised 18 and 25 items, respectively, with 10 overlapping items, and 23 discordant items (ĸ 0.363). Examples of items prioritised by both included “diabetes” and “leakage from bowel joins”. Examples of discordant items included “re-admission rates” (professionals only), and “excess skin” (patients only). Poor agreement was seen in the ‘quality of life’ section (0 overlapping items, 8 discordant, ĸ -0.036).
Conclusions: Although there was some overlap of outcomes prioritised by professionals and patients, there were important differences. We recommend that the views of all relevant health professionals and patients are considered when deciding on outcomes to evaluate bariatric surgery.

    Structured keywords

  • ConDuCT-II
  • Centre for Surgical Research

    Research areas

  • Outcomes, Patient views, Health professional views, Quality of life, Survey, Core outcome sets

Download statistics

No data available



  • Full-text PDF (final published version)

    Rights statement: This is the final published version of the article (version of record). It first appeared online via Springer at

    Final published version, 399 KB, PDF document

    Licence: CC BY


View research connections

Related faculties, schools or groups