Skip to content

A simulated annealing approach to the student-project allocation problem

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)701-708
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Journal of Physics
Issue number9
Early online date23 Aug 2018
DateAccepted/In press - 1 Jun 2018
DateE-pub ahead of print - 23 Aug 2018
DatePublished (current) - 1 Sep 2018


We describe a solution to the student-project allocation problem using simulated annealing. The problem involves assigning students to projects, where each student has ranked a fixed number of projects in order of preference. Each project is offered by a specific supervisor (or supervisors), and the goal is to find an optimal matching of students to projects taking into account the students' preferences, the constraint that only one student can be assigned to a given project, and the constraint that supervisors have a maximum workload. We show that when applied to a real dataset from a university physics department, simulated annealing allows the rapid determination of high quality solutions to this allocation problem. The quality of the solution is quantified by a satisfaction metric derived from empirical student survey data. Our approach provides high quality allocations in a matter of minutes that are as good as those found previously by the course organizer using a laborious trial-and-error approach. We investigate how the quality of the allocation is affected by the ratio of the number of projects offered to the number of students and the number of projects ranked by each student. We briefly discuss how our approach can be generalized to include other types of constraints and discuss its potential applicability to wider allocation problems.

Download statistics

No data available



  • Full-text PDF (accepted author manuscript)

    Rights statement: This is the author accepted manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via AAPT at . Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.

    Accepted author manuscript, 383 KB, PDF document

    Licence: Other


View research connections

Related faculties, schools or groups