Skip to content

Corbynism’s conveyor belt of ideas: Postcapitalism and the politics of social reproduction

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)423-434
Number of pages13
JournalCapital and Class
Issue number3
Early online date9 Oct 2017
DateAccepted/In press - 1 Aug 2017
DateE-pub ahead of print - 9 Oct 2017
DatePublished (current) - Oct 2017


In this reflection, we assess the theoretical faultline running through the contested current of Corbynist thought and politics at present. On one hand, we find a techno-utopian strand obsessed with automation and the end of work. On the other, a nascent politics of social reproduction with a foreshortened potential to realise the promise of a continental-style solidarity economics in the UK. Both represent the latest in a series of left attempts to confront the crisis of social democracy that rages across Europe, a crisis to which the British Labour Party has not been alone in succumbing. Deindustrialisation collapsed labour's role in everyday life, and a crisis in the society of work eventually passed over into its representative party’s electoral decline. Subsequent financial crisis and subsequent austerity has only made things worse. A poverty of ideas prevails that all sides of social democracy’s unsteady compromise seek desperately to solve. However, the recent UK General Election shows evidence that Corbynism has renewed Labour’s fortunes to some extent. Surveying the competing intellectual currents behind its rise, we suggest that the politics of social reproduction offer a better route forward for the Labour Party than the popular siren call of postcapitalism, and reflect on what the recent general election result suggests for their future development.

    Structured keywords

  • Global Political Economy
  • Perspectives on Work

    Research areas

  • Corbyn, Corbynism, social reproduction, postcapitalism, accelerationism, Political sociology, Labour Party, Politics

Download statistics

No data available



  • Full-text PDF (accepted author manuscript)

    Rights statement: This is the author accepted manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via Sage at Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.

    Accepted author manuscript, 513 KB, PDF-document


View research connections

Related faculties, schools or groups