Skip to content

Epistemic uncertainties and natural hazard risk assessment - Part 1: A review of the issues

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
JournalNatural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
DateSubmitted - 15 Dec 2017
DateAccepted/In press (current) - 24 Sep 2018

Abstract

Uncertainties in natural hazard risk assessment are generally dominated by the sources arising from lack of knowledge or understanding of the processes involved. There is a lack of knowledge about frequencies, process representations, parameters, present and future boundary conditions, consequences and impacts, and the meaning of observations in evaluating simulation models. These are the epistemic uncertainties that can be difficult to constrain, especially in terms of event or scenario probabilities, even as elicited probabilities rationalized on the basis of expert judgements. This paper reviews the issues raised by trying to quantify the effects of epistemic uncertainties. Such scientific uncertainties might have significant influence on decisions that are made for risk management, so it is important to communicate the meaning of an uncertainty estimate and to provide an audit trail of the assumptions on which it is based. Some suggestions for good practice in doing so are made.

Documents

Documents

  • Full-text PDF (accepted author manuscript)

    Accepted author manuscript, 9 MB, PDF-document

    Embargo ends: 1/01/99

    Request copy

View research connections

Related faculties, schools or groups