Skip to content

Information Foraging for Perceptual Decisions

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)245-264
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
Volume43
Issue number2
Early online date7 Nov 2016
DOIs
DateAccepted/In press - 11 Jul 2016
DateE-pub ahead of print - 7 Nov 2016
DatePublished (current) - Feb 2017

Abstract

We tested an information foraging framework to characterise the mechanisms that drive active (visual) sampling behaviour in decision problems that involve multiple sources of information. Experiments 1-3 involved participants making an absolute judgement about the direction of motion of a single random dot motion pattern. In Experiment 4, participants made a relative comparison between two motion patterns that could only be sampled sequentially. Our results show that: (i) Information (about noisy motion information) grows to an asymptotic level that depends on the quality of the information source; (ii) The limited growth is due to unequal weighting of the incoming sensory evidence, with early samples being weighted more heavily; (iii) Little information is lost once a new source of information is being sampled; (iv) The point at which the observer switches from one source to another is governed by online monitoring of his or her degree of (un)certainty about the sampled source. These findings demonstrate that the sampling strategy in perceptual decision-making is under some direct control by ongoing cognitive processing. More specifically, participants are able to track a measure of (un)certainty and use this information to guide their sampling behaviour.

    Structured keywords

  • Cognitive Science
  • Visual Perception

    Research areas

  • decision making, information search, eye movements, attention, computational models

Download statistics

No data available

Documents

Documents

  • Full-text PDF (final published version)

    Rights statement: This is the final published version of the article (version of record). It first appeared online via American Psychological Association at http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000299. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.

    Final published version, 471 KB, PDF document

    Licence: CC BY

DOI

View research connections

Related faculties, schools or groups