Skip to content

Metagenomic insights into diazotrophic communities across Arctic glacier forefields

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
Article numberfiy114
Number of pages12
JournalFEMS Microbiology Ecology
Issue number9
Early online date13 Jun 2018
DateAccepted/In press - 4 Jun 2018
DateE-pub ahead of print - 13 Jun 2018
DatePublished (current) - 1 Sep 2018


Microbial nitrogen fixation is crucial for building labile nitrogen stocks and facilitating higher plant colonisation in oligotrophic glacier forefield soils. Here, the diazotrophic bacterial community structure across four Arctic glacier forefields was investigated using metagenomic analysis. In total, 70 soil metagenomes were used for taxonomic interpretation based on 185 nitrogenase (nif) sequences, extracted from assembled contigs. The low number of recovered genes highlights the need for deeper sequencing in some diverse samples, to uncover the complete microbial populations. A key group of forefield diazotrophs, found throughout the forefields, was identified using a nifH phylogeny, associated with nifH Cluster I and III. Sequences related most closely to groups including Alphaproteobacteria, Betaproteobacteria, Cyanobacteria and Firmicutes. Using multiple nif genes in a Last Common Ancestor analysis revealed a diverse range of diazotrophs across the forefields. Key organisms identified across the forefields included Nostoc, Geobacter, Polaromonas and Frankia. Nitrogen fixers that are symbiotic with plants were also identified, through the presence of root associated diazotrophs, which fix nitrogen in return for reduced carbon. Additional nitrogen fixers identified in forefield soils were metabolically diverse, including fermentative and sulphur cycling bacteria, halophiles and anaerobes.

    Research areas

  • Nitrogen fixation, Metagenomics, Forefield, Arctic, Diversity, Diazotrophs

Download statistics

No data available



  • Full-text PDF (final published version)

    Rights statement: This is the final published version of the article (version of record). It first appeared online via Oxford University Press at . Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.

    Final published version, 825 KB, PDF document

    Licence: CC BY


View research connections

Related faculties, schools or groups