Skip to content

Size and contrast increase the divertive effect of eyespots

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
Article numberary149
Pages (from-to)159-165
Number of pages7
JournalBehavioral Ecology
Issue number1
Early online date24 Oct 2018
DateAccepted/In press - 5 Oct 2018
DateE-pub ahead of print - 24 Oct 2018
DatePublished (current) - 4 Mar 2019


Recent studies have shown that some eyespots of prey divert the strikes of predators, increasing the likelihood of prey escape. However, little is known about what makes eyespots effective divertive (deflective) prey marks. The size of eyespots varies much both between and even within taxa. Yet, whether size is important for the divertive function of eyespots is unknown. Furthermore, eyespots have often been described as highly contrasting, but the effects of contrast on the divertive function of eyespots has never been tested experimentally. Using artificial prey and the three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) as a model for predator cognition and behaviour, we tested the importance of size as well as internal contrast for the divertive effect of eyespots. We independently increased the internal contrast and size of eyespots and found that both increased the divertive effect. The effect of size was significant over all four subsequent prey presentations, whereas the effect of contrast decreased after the initial presentations. These results suggest that the size and contrast of divertive marks are probably shaped by selection imposed by predation. We also discuss the involvement of predation in the seasonal and ontogenic plasticity of eyespots found in some taxa.

    Research areas

  • diversion, deception, deflection, eyespot, Gasterosteus aculeatus, predation, protective coloration, visual attention

Download statistics

No data available



  • Full-text PDF (accepted author manuscript)

    Rights statement: This is the author accepted manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via Oxford University Press at . Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.

    Accepted author manuscript, 306 KB, PDF document

    Licence: Unspecified


View research connections

Related faculties, schools or groups