Skip to content

The adoption of the materiality concept in social and environmental reporting assurance: A field study approach

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-18
Number of pages18
JournalBritish Accounting Review
Issue number1
Early online date15 Nov 2014
DateAccepted/In press - 5 Nov 2014
DateE-pub ahead of print - 15 Nov 2014
DatePublished (current) - 1 Mar 2015


This study investigates the logics or values that shape the social and environmental reporting (SER) and SER assurance (SERA) process. The influence of logics is observed through a study of the conceptualisation and operationalisation of the materiality concept by accounting and non-accounting assurors and their assurance statements. We gathered qualitative data from interviews with both accounting and non-accounting assurors. We analysed the interplay between old and new logics that are shaping materiality as a reporting concept in SER. SER is a rich field in which to study the dynamics of change because it is a voluntary, unregulated, qualitative reporting arena. It has a broad, stakeholder audience, where accounting and non-accounting organisations are in competition. There are three key findings. First, the introduction of a new, stakeholder logic has significantly changed the meaning and role of materiality. Second, a more versatile, performative, social understanding of materiality was portrayed by assurors, with a forward-looking rather than a historic focus. Third, competing logics have encouraged different beliefs about materiality, and practices, to develop. This influenced the way assurors theorised the concept and interpreted outcomes. A patchwork of localised understandings of materiality is developing. Policy implications both in SERA and also in financial audit are explored.

    Research areas

  • Institutional logics, Materiality, Social and environmental reporting assurance (SERA)

Download statistics

No data available



  • Full-text PDF (accepted author manuscript)

    Rights statement: This is the accepted author manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via Elsevier at Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.

    Accepted author manuscript, 398 KB, PDF document

    Licence: CC BY-NC-ND


View research connections

Related faculties, schools or groups