Skip to content

Theorising the 'deliberative father': Compromise, progress and striving to do fatherhood well

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)281-294
Number of pages14
JournalFamilies, Relationships and Societies
Issue number2
Early online date1 Jul 2015
DateE-pub ahead of print - 1 Jul 2015
DatePublished (current) - 2 Jul 2015


This article presents qualitative data collected during a project funded by the Economic and Social Research Council exploring 11 men's experience of first-time fatherhood. It draws specifically on data from interviews conducted after the birth of their child, to present three different ways that men attempt to construct 'fairness' in their fathering practice. It uses this data to begin to theorise the 'deliberative father', which is presented as a morally progressive form of fatherhood that focuses on process rather than practice. Three counter-arguments are considered, with particular attention paid to Reece's (2013) argument against thin conceptions of 'reflective' parenting. The article concludes that deliberative fatherhood is not morally progressive because the process of deliberation ensures morally optimal practice. Rather, it is morally progressive because the process of deliberation makes morally optimal practice possible.

    Research areas

  • Compromise, Fatherhood, Fathers, Moral progress, Parenting

Download statistics

No data available



  • Full-text PDF (final published version)

    Rights statement: This is the final published version of the article (version of record). It first appeared online via Polity Press at Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.

    Final published version, 102 KB, PDF-document

    Licence: CC BY


View research connections

Related faculties, schools or groups