Skip to content

Transthoracic clamp versus endo-aortic balloon occlusion in minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
DOIs
DateSubmitted - 1 Oct 2018
DateAccepted/In press - 27 Dec 2018
DatePublished (current) - 2 Feb 2019

Abstract

This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to determine outcomes following aortic occlusion with the transthoracic clamp (TTC) versus endoaortic balloon occlusion (EABO) in patients undergoing minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIMVS). A subgroup analysis compares TTC to EABO with femoral cannulation separately from EABO with aortic cannulation. We searched Medline and Embase up to December 2018. Two people independently and in duplicate screened title and abstracts, full-text reports, extracted data and assessed risk-of-bias (ROB) using the Cochrane ROB tool for non-randomised studies. We identified 1564 reports from which 11 observational studies with 4181 participants met the inclusion criteria. We found no evidence of difference in the risk of post-operative death or cerebrovascular accident (CVA) between the two techniques. Evidence for a reduction in aortic dissection with TTC was found: 4/1590 for the TTC group versus 19/2492 for the EABO group (RR, 0.33, 95% CI, [0.12] to [0.93], p=0.04). There was no difference in aortic cross-clamp (AoX) time between TTC and EABO (mean difference [-5.17] minutes, 95% CI, [-12.40] to [2.06], p=0.16). TTC was associated with a shorter AoX time compared to EABO with femoral cannulation (mean difference [-9.26] minutes, 95% CI, [-17.00] to [-1.52], p=0.02). EABO with aortic cannulation was associated with a shorter AoX time compared to TTC (mean difference [7.77] minutes, 95% CI, [3.29] to 12.26], p<0.001). There was no difference in cardio-pulmonary bypass (CPB) time between TTC and EABO with aortic cannulation (mean difference [-4.98] minutes, 95% CI, [-14.41] to [4.45], p=0.3). TTC was associated with a shorter CPB time compared to EABO with femoral cannulation (mean difference [-10.08] minutes, 95% CI, [-19.93] to [-0.22], p=0.05). Despite a higher risk of aortic dissection with EABO, the rates of survival and CVA across the two techniques are similar in MIMVS.

    Research areas

  • Cardiac Surgery, Minimally invasive surgery, mitral valve surgery, Endoaortic balloon occlusion, Chitwood clamp, Transthoracic clamp, Systematic review, Meta-Analysis

    Structured keywords

  • Centre for Surgical Research

Documents

Documents

  • Full-text PDF (accepted author manuscript)

    Rights statement: This is the accepted author manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via OUP at https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezy489 . Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.

    Accepted author manuscript, 432 KB, PDF document

    Embargo ends: 2/02/20

    Request copy

    Licence: Other

DOI

View research connections

Related faculties, schools or groups